Two Ways Pharma “Tests” Vaccines to Hide Vaccine Harms
Brett Weinstein explains:
So if you have something dangerous and it's in the shots to do some job like activate your immune system so that it reacts to the the core ingredient of the shot, if it's dangerous but it's in the control and the shot that's being tested, let's say it kills one in 100 people. This is an extreme case, but let's just say that the adjuvant were to kill one in 100 people. Well, if the adjuvant is in both the control and the treatment group, then what the experiment will show is that there was no increased tendency towards death if you got the shot, because it was also the harm was also done to the control group. That is one way of hiding harm.The second way to hide harm is for pharma always tries to hit this target where something that it is testing against a quote, unquote placebo, which isn't one, is so good that it becomes immoral not to give it to the control group. And so what they do is they rush to vaccinate the control group, thereby stopping the capacity to see what the long term effect of the thing that you were testing is on that population, because you have no one to compare it to because everybody's now had it.